No parents want their children to adopt habits that pose serious
health risks, such as excessive drinking, smoking, or using illicit
drugs. But the fact is many children will experiment with each of
these substances, with some non-trivial percentage eventually
becoming regular users or abusers.
According to the most recent Gallup Youth Survey*, 17% of
teenagers (aged 13 to 17) are willing to admit they have
occasion to use alcohol, 13% say they had tried
marijuana, and 5% say they had smoked cigarettes in the past
week. These rates represent different frequencies of use, but
probably reflect the use patterns that are most troubling to
parents: occasional drinking, experimentation with drugs, and
regular use of tobacco.
The rates of drinking and experimentation with marijuana, at
least, are high enough that all parents would be wise to take an
active role in discouraging their children from getting involved in
these behaviors. But the data show some teens are more likely to
fall prey to temptation than others.
Substance Use by Age, Family Status, and Church
Attendance
First of all, drinking, smoking, and marijuana use are more
prevalent among older teens than younger teens. The rates of use
are at least double among 16- and 17-year-olds, compared with those
aged 13 to 15. So, come about 10th grade, parents should
really start to worry.
Household structure is another important factor. Teens whose
parents are divorced are about twice as likely as those whose
parents are married to report these behaviors.
Being active in one's religious faith is also correlated with
lower rates of risky behavior. Teens who attended church or
synagogue in the last week (an indicator of regular attendance) are
about half as likely to drink, smoke cigarettes, or experiment with
marijuana as those who didn't attend. However, whether this is
because of the influence of religion or the influence of family is
unclear. Church attendance is much higher among teens whose parents
are married (53%) than among those whose parents are divorced
(38%). Most likely the two factors -- family and church attendance
-- work in tandem to positively influence teens.
A third factor, which is not highly related to the marital
structure of the household or teens' religious attendance (or even
to age), is having a boyfriend or girlfriend. Teens involved in
these relationships are about twice as likely to drink and have
tried marijuana, and are much more likely to smoke, than are those
who have no boyfriend or girlfriend.
Substance Use by Class Standing and Gender
Being a good student is associated with lower rates of cigarette
smoking and trying marijuana, but it is no barrier to the influence
of alcohol. Fifteen percent of teens who describe themselves as top
students say they have occasion to drink, compared with 17% of
those who are average or below average in school.
Gender does not seem to be important in relation to these risky
behaviors. Male and female teens exhibit equal tendencies to drink,
smoke, and try marijuana.
Bottom Line
Some parents may try to lull themselves into a false sense of
security about their children's association with risky behaviors.
Others may have exaggerated fears about the chances their kids
could wind up in rehab before they get to college. In either case,
information about the true pattern of substance abuse among teens
is probably helpful.
The Gallup data confirm the importance of stable families to
warding off peer pressure. Religious faith, whether alone or in
tandem with a nuclear family, may also help. At the same time, the
data suggest that, while "going steady" may have been a wholesome
venture for the merry band of high school students on Happy
Days, it can perhaps hasten one's sense of maturity -- or at
least be associated with an inflated sense of maturity. And wanting
to feel "grown up," according to some research, is the real driving
force behind the attraction of these risky activities.
*These results are based on telephone interviews with a
randomly selected national sample of 1,028 teenagers in
the Gallup Poll Panel of households, aged 13 to 17,
conducted Jan. 17 to Feb. 6, 2005. For results based on this
sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum error
attributable to sampling and other random effects is ±3
percentage points. In addition to sampling error, question wording
and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce
error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.
