Labor Migration Doesn't Always Pay Off for FSU Migrants

Labor Migration Doesn't Always Pay Off for FSU Migrants

by Neli Esipova and Anita Pugliese

Four in 10 return migrants did not see their family situations improve

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Nearly four in 10 migrants who have returned home to their countries in the former Soviet Union said the temporary work they did abroad did not improve their families' economic situations.

Migration doesn't pay off.gif

Results from interviews between 2010 and 2012 with return migrants in nine former Soviet Union countries also indicate relatively few benefited professionally from their temporary work in another country. Less than half (48%) of these return migrants said their professional qualifications improved as a result, and 31% said their work experience in another country helped them get a better paying job when they returned home. One-third of these return migrants said they were working in their main profession while they were abroad.

Return migrants from Central Asia were most likely to benefit financially and professionally from their time working in another country. More than half of Central Asian return migrants reported their professional qualifications improved, compared with 38% in Moldova and 37% in the Caucasus reporting the same. In addition, 39% in Central Asia got better paying jobs after returning to their home country, compared with 17% of Moldovans and 16% in the Caucasus.

Migration benefits more in Central Asia.gif

Women who worked abroad realized fewer benefits than did men on all dimensions measured. Female return migrants were less likely to work in their main professions while in other countries and less likely to gain professional benefits. The gender gap is largest in the improvement of professional qualifications dimension.

Men benefit more from migration than women.gif

How migrants spent the money they earned abroad may shed some light on why so many said their situations did not improve. The vast majority of people (63%) said that they spent most of the money on basic needs. Few reported using this money to invest in their future: 2% spent the money on their own or their family members' education, 3% used it to open businesses, and 3% saved it.


Most of these former Soviet countries are highly dependent on their people working in other countries. To maximize the potential benefits from return migration, governments in these countries could provide language and skills training. Such training could aid migrants in getting better jobs in other countries and in gaining additional knowledge and experience that they can share when they return to their home country. Offering financial and business literacy training may also help workers invest in their future through education and savings.

For complete data sets or custom research from the more than 150 countries Gallup continually surveys, please contact us.

Survey Methods

Results are based on with 19,000 adults, aged 15 and older, in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan. Interviews were conducted face to face between 2010 and 2012. A total of 1,330 survey respondents were identified as temporary labor migrants (in past 10 years had worked in another country temporarily and came back home). One can say with 95% confidence that the margin of sampling error for the total sample of 1,330 respondents is less than ±3.5 percentage points. Margin of error for subgroups is larger.

For more complete methodology and specific survey dates, please review Gallup's Country Data Set details.

Get Articles in Related Topics:

Gallup World Headquarters, 901 F Street, Washington, D.C., 20001, U.S.A
+1 202.715.3030