The 2002 Gallup Poll of the Islamic World has led to an
enormous amount of public discussion about the survey's findings
and their implications. The survey presents the results of 10,000
hour-long, in-person, in-home interviews with scientific samplings
of the adult populations of nine predominantly Islamic countries.
It represents an accomplishment virtually unprecedented in several
of these societies -- at least with regard to interviews covering
controversial and sensitive political issues.
With regard to the poll's methodology, one of the questions that
has been asked is why the sample in Kuwait included both Kuwaiti
citizens and expatriates ("expats") -- people who reside in Kuwait,
but do not hold Kuwaiti citizenship. Following is an interview with
Richard Burkholder, Gallup's Director of International Research and
a veteran of dozens of international polling projects, who explains
the sampling method in Kuwait, and sheds some light on the results
there.
Q: In the 2002 Gallup Poll of the Islamic World, your sample
in Kuwait included both Kuwaiti citizens and "expats" (expatriates)
who reside in Kuwait, but do not hold Kuwaiti citizenship. Why is
that?
A: In Kuwait, expats make up over half the country's resident
population -- 59% of the total society's adult population. Those
holding Kuwaiti citizenship are actually in the minority --
according to government estimates, they constitute only 42% of all
resident adults. Had we opted not to include their views, we
would have restricted our measurement to a minority of the
society.
Q: Is it normal to include the views of citizens and
non-citizens alike in a poll of this sort?
A: Yes, this is the norm -- not only in Kuwait, where Pan Arab
Research Center (founded in 1976) has been polling the local
population for more than a quarter of a century, but also in the
United States. When measuring, for example, the attitudes of Los
Angeles residents toward the city's school system, we do not first
require respondents to provide evidence of proof of residency.
Q: Doesn't the sample's inclusion of expats -- who are not
formally Kuwaiti citizens -- skew the survey's results?
A: In fact, systematically excluding the perspective of more
than half the country's long-term residents would result in a far
less comprehensive and representative sounding of the views of
Kuwaiti society.
Q: Aren't most of these expats just living in Kuwait as
temporary guests? In what sense are they an integral part of
Kuwaiti society?
A: The vast majority of expats are long-term residents of
Kuwait, and have been in the country for many years, decades, or
even generations. Many, in fact, were born in Kuwait, but
are ineligible for citizenship under Kuwaiti law because they are
descended from earlier immigrants, rather than from families who
lived in Kuwait many decades ago. Only a small minority will ever
return to the land of their origin, and many are now no more
"rooted" in that earlier homeland than, for example,
third-generation Americans in 1820 would have been to England.
Q: But aren't their views systematically different from the
views of those who hold citizenship? And do your findings allow you
to assess the differences between those respondents who formally
hold citizenship and those who don't?
A: Gallup's questionnaire included a demographic item to
indicate whether the respondent held Kuwaiti citizenship, so that
this issue could be assessed at the analytical stage of the
project. Gallup has now analyzed the results from this hour-long
survey, and has contrasted the views expressed by Kuwaiti nationals
and expats, respectively. The result: on many, if not most, issues
in this survey, the views of these two groups are remarkably
similar.
Although Kuwaiti nationals have slightly more favorable feelings
than do expats toward the U.S., for example, this difference is
relatively modest (average rating of U.S. among nationals on
5-point scale: 3.0, among expats: 2.6). Kuwaiti nationals do give a
significantly higher approval rating to President Bush (nationals:
4.6 on a 10-point scale, expats: 2.4), though neither group rates
Bush positively. They are also more likely than are expats to see
the U.S. military action in Afghanistan as being "largely" or
"completely" morally justified -- though this is a minority view
among both nationals and expats (nationals: 22%, expats:
12%).
However, in regard to the specific attributes they
associate with the U.S., the responses of the two groups are
virtually identical:"
|
Say they see U.S. as:
|
Total society
|
Nationals
|
Expats
|
| |
|
|
|
|
"aggressive"
|
72%
|
75%
|
70%
|
|
"arrogant"
|
65%
|
66%
|
65%
|
|
"gets provoked easily"
|
55%
|
51%
|
60%
|
|
"ruthless"
|
69%
|
68%
|
69%
|
|
"conceited"
|
73%
|
73%
|
72%
|
|
"high rates of crime"
|
84%
|
84%
|
83%
|
|
"adopts biased policies in world affairs"
|
83%
|
88%
|
79%
|
Kuwaiti nationals are no more likely than are expats to regard
the attacks of Sept. 11 as morally unjustifiable -- in fact, they
are actually slightly less likely to describe them in this
way. Some 40% of those with Kuwaiti citizenship describe the
attacks as either largely or completely justifiable (5-point
scale), whereas 32% of expats in Kuwait take this view. In
contrast, 31% of Kuwaiti nationals describe the Sept. 11 attacks as
largely or completely unjustifiable, compared to 44% of
expats residing in the country.
Q: How much experience does the field force that collected
the data in Kuwait have with sample design in that country, and
with accurately measuring the country's opinions and
attitudes?
A: Pan Arab Research Center, Kuwait's most respected and
experienced survey research firm, handled the interviewing in that
country. Founded in Kuwait in 1976, PARC now operates full-fledged
subsidiaries in seven countries throughout the region. The entire
company was headquartered in Kuwait until the 1990 Iraqi invasion
(PARC's headquarters are now in Dubai, U.A.E.). No firm can boast
greater accumulated expertise in the measurement of Kuwaiti
attitudes. PARC's current executive field manager, for example, has
over two decades' tenure in the field of sample design and data
collection within the Kuwaiti market.
Q: To what degree did Gallup itself monitor and supervise the
interviewing within Kuwait on this survey?
A: I traveled to Kuwait to personally observe the interviewing
process within the country. While there, I attended numerous
in-home, in-person interviews with both Kuwaiti nationals and
resident expats, in order to get a first-hand perspective on the
quality and reliability of the data-collection process used for
this poll.