Self-assessment can be a tricky business at any age, but it is
especially so for adolescents. Teens want to see themselves in the
best possible light at school -- typically the main stage on which
they succeed or falter with their peer groups and authority
figures. But perceptions are not always grounded in reality.
A recent Gallup Youth Survey* asked respondents aged 13 to 17 to
rate their own academic and school-related performance. A slight
majority of teens (51%) consider themselves to be good at most
school subjects and activities, and 44% say they are good at just a
few. Only 4% of teens believe that there is nothing in school that
they do well.

The finding that most teens are confident in their abilities in
at least some school subjects is positive. However, thinking
oneself "good" at something may be relatively subjective. Does
being good mean that one meets or exceeds personal standards or
academic standards? And, are either of those high enough?
The American Diploma Project released a report last week titled,
Ready or Not: Creating a High School Diploma That Counts,
that assessed the skills necessary for employment and college-level
work. It found that a high school diploma is "little more than a
certificate of attendance." For high school graduates who go
directly to work after school, many employers say they lack basic
skills necessary to do the job. The ADP report cites startling 2001
Public Agenda survey figures: More than 60% of college professors
rate freshman and sophomore students’ abilities in grammar,
spelling, writing, and basic math as "fair" or "poor."
Furthermore, according to National Center for Education
Statistics figures, 28% of high school graduates must take remedial
English or math courses immediately upon entering a two- or
four-year college, and that at some point during their college
years, 53% of students take at least one remedial English or math
class.
Self-Ratings of School Performance Vary by
Race
Gallup’s data show that in terms of classifying their
academic performance, teenagers’ opinions vary significantly
by race. White students are considerably more positive about their
academic performance than nonwhite students are. Nearly three in
five white teens, 57%, believe that they are good at most school
subjects and activities, as do 41% of nonwhite students. A slight
majority of nonwhite students, 53%, think there are a few subjects
or activities at school that they are particularly good at.

Younger Teens More Confident Than Older
Teens
Teens between the ages of 13 and 15 are more likely than those
slightly older to believe that they are good at most school
subjects and activities. A majority of younger teens (57%) say they
are good at most subjects and activities, compared with 42% of 16-
and 17-year-olds. Older teens are inclined to give their
performance a more modest rating, with 51% saying they are only
good at a few school subjects or activities. One possible
explanation why older teens may feel this way is that many older
teens have more -- and often tougher -- academic courses available
to them than younger teens do. With a broader range of courses,
older teens may feel less confident than they did in earlier grades
when they had fewer course options and less to master.

Bottom Line
Although it’s good news that 95% of teens feel they excel
in at least a few subjects, the American Diploma Project study
seems to suggest that even those who do well at most subjects may
not be adequately prepared for work or college upon graduation. In
order to satisfy future employers and professors, the study
recommends that high school students undertake and achieve
proficiency in rigorous math courses, develop strong oral and
written communication skills, and acquire analytical and research
skills in the language arts curriculum.
*The Gallup Youth Survey is conducted via an Internet
methodology provided by Knowledge Networks, using an online
research panel that is designed to be representative of the entire
U.S. population. The current questionnaire was completed by 517
respondents, aged 13 to 17, between Aug. 1 and Aug. 29, 2003. For
results based on the total sample, one can say with 95% confidence
that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±5 percentage
points.