
Do you approve or disapprove of the way the Supreme Court is handling its job?
| Approve |
Disapprove |
No opinion |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
|
|
2009 Aug 31-Sep 2 |
61 |
28 |
11 |
|
2009 Jun 14-17 |
59 |
30 |
11 |
|
2008 Sep 8-11 |
50 |
39 |
11 |
|
2008 Jun 9-12 |
48 |
38 |
14 |
|
2007 Sep 14-16 |
51 |
39 |
10 |
|
2007 May 10-13 |
51 |
36 |
13 |
|
2006 Sep 7-10 |
60 |
32 |
8 |
|
2005 Sep 12-15 |
56 |
36 |
8 |
|
2005 Jun 24-26 |
42 |
48 |
10 |
|
2004 Sep 13-15 |
51 |
39 |
10 |
|
2003 Sep 8-10 |
52 |
38 |
10 |
|
2003 Jul 7-9 |
59 |
33 |
8 |
| 2002 Sep 5-8 |
60 |
29 |
11 |
|
2001 Sep 7-10 |
58 |
28 |
14 |
|
2001 Jun 11-17 |
62 |
25 |
13 |
|
2001 Jan 10-14 |
59 |
34 |
7 |
|
2000 Aug 29-Sep 5 |
62 |
29 |
9 |
As you know, our federal government is made up of three branches: an executive branch, headed by the president: a judicial branch, headed by the U.S. Supreme Court: and a legislative branch, made up of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. First, let me ask you how much trust and confidence you have at this time in the executive branch headed by the president, the judicial branch headed by the U.S. Supreme Court, and the legislative branch, consisting of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives -- a great deal, a fair amount, not very much, or none at all?
The judicial branch, headed by the U.S. Supreme Court
|
Great |
Fair |
Not very |
None |
No |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
2009 Aug 31-Sep 2 |
18 |
58 |
18 |
4 |
2 |
|
2008 Sep 8-11 |
14 |
55 |
23 |
6 |
3 |
|
2007 Sep 14-16 |
15 |
54 |
23 |
6 |
1 |
|
2006 Sep 7-10 |
15 |
54 |
21 |
7 |
3 |
|
2005 Sep 12-15 |
13 |
55 |
25 |
6 |
1 |
|
2004 Sep 13-15 |
14 |
51 |
27 |
6 |
2 |
|
2003 Sep 8-10 |
13 |
54 |
27 |
5 |
1 |
|
2002 Sep 5-8 |
17 |
58 |
18 |
5 |
2 |
|
2001 Sep 7-10 |
17 |
57 |
20 |
4 |
2 |
|
2000 Jul 6-9 |
23 |
52 |
18 |
6 |
1 |
|
1999 Feb 4-8 |
29 |
51 |
13 |
5 |
2 |
|
1998 Dec 28-29 |
27 |
51 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
|
1997 May 30-Jun 1 |
19 |
52 |
22 |
5 |
2 |
|
1976 Jun |
16 |
47 |
26 |
6 |
4 |
|
1974 Apr |
17 |
54 |
20 |
5 |
5 |
|
1972 May |
17 |
49 |
24 |
7 |
4 |
In general, do you think the current Supreme Court is too liberal, too conservative, or just about right?
|
Too |
Too |
About |
No |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
2009 Aug 31-Sep 2 |
28 |
19 |
50 |
3 |
|
2008 Sep 8-11 |
21 |
30 |
43 |
6 |
|
2007 Sep 14-16 |
21 |
32 |
43 |
5 |
|
2006 Sep 7-10 |
21 |
31 |
43 |
6 |
|
2005 Sep 12-15 |
25 |
25 |
45 |
5 |
|
2004 Sep 13-15 |
28 |
27 |
40 |
5 |
|
2003 Sep 8-10 |
31 |
25 |
39 |
5 |
|
2001 Sep 7-10 |
22 |
25 |
46 |
7 |
|
1995 Jul 7-9 |
31 |
20 |
41 |
8 |
|
1993 Jun 18-21 ^ |
22 |
24 |
45 |
9 |
|
^ Asked of a half sample |
||||
Trends for comparison: In its recent rulings, do you think the Supreme Court has been too liberal, too conservative, or just about right?
|
Too |
Too |
About |
No |
|
|
2003 Jul 7-9 |
31% |
15 |
48 |
6 |
|
2000 Aug 29-Sep 5 |
27% |
16 |
49 |
8 |
|
1991 July 11-14 |
20% |
25 |
39 |
16 |
As you may know, Sonia Sotomayor is the federal judge nominated to serve on the Supreme Court. Would you like to see the Senate vote in favor of Sotomayor serving on the Supreme Court, or not?
|
Yes, vote |
No, not |
No opinion |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
|
|
Sonia Sotomayor |
|||
| 2009 Jul 17-19 |
55 |
36 |
9 |
| 2009 Jul 10-12 |
53 |
33 |
13 |
|
2009 May 29-31 |
54 |
28 |
19 |
|
Trend for other Supreme Court nominees |
|||
|
Samuel Alito |
|||
|
2006 Jan 20-22 |
54 |
30 |
16 |
|
2006 Jan 6-8 |
49 |
30 |
21 |
|
2005 Dec 9-11 |
49 |
29 |
22 |
|
2005 Nov 7-10 |
50 |
25 |
25 |
|
Harriet Miers |
|||
|
2005 Oct 21-23 |
42 |
43 |
15 |
|
2005 Oct 13-16^ |
44 |
36 |
20 |
|
John Roberts |
|||
|
2005 Sep 16-18 † |
60 |
26 |
14 |
|
2005 Sep 8-11 † |
58 |
27 |
15 |
|
2005 Aug 28-30 |
52 |
26 |
22 |
|
2005 Aug 5-7 |
51 |
28 |
21 |
|
2005 Jul 22-24 |
59 |
22 |
19 |
|
Ruth Bader Ginsburg |
|||
|
1993 Jun 18-21 ‡ |
53 |
14 |
33 |
|
Clarence Thomas |
|||
|
1991 Oct 14 |
58 |
30 |
12 |
|
1991 Oct 10-13 |
53 |
30 |
17 |
|
1991 Sep 13-15 |
54 |
25 |
21 |
|
1991 Aug 8-11 |
56 |
23 |
21 |
|
1991 Jul 11-14 |
52 |
17 |
31 |
|
Robert Bork |
|||
|
1987 Sep 1-13 • ♠ |
38 |
35 |
26 |
|
1987 Aug 24-Sep 2 • |
31 |
25 |
44 |
|
^ Asked of a half sample |
|||
|
† WORDING: As you may know, John Roberts is a federal judge who has been nominated to serve as chief justice on the Supreme Court. Would you like to see the Senate vote in favor of Roberts serving as chief justice on the Supreme Court, or not? |
|||
|
‡ WORDING: Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a federal judge who has been nominated by President Clinton to serve on the United States Supreme Court. Would you like to see the Senate vote in favor of Ginsburg serving on the Supreme Court, or not? |
|||
|
• WORDING: Robert Bork is a federal judge who has been nominated by President Reagan to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court. Would you like to see the Senate vote in favor of Bork serving on the U.S. Supreme Court, or not? |
|||
|
♠ Gallup for Times Mirror |
|||
How closely are you following the news about Sonia Sotomayor's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court -- very closely, somewhat closely, not too closely, or not at all?
|
Very |
Somewhat |
Not too |
Not |
No |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
| 2009 Jul 10-12 |
14 |
39 |
27 |
19 |
1 |
|
2009 May 29-31 |
20 |
40 |
22 |
18 |
-- |
(Asked of a half sample) From what you know about Sonia Sotomayor, do you think she would be too liberal, too conservative, or just about right as a Supreme Court justice?
|
Too |
Too |
About |
No |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
Sonia Sotomayor |
||||
|
2009 May 29-31 ^ |
28 |
3 |
48 |
20 |
|
Samuel Alito |
||||
|
2006 Jan 6-8 ^ |
6 |
29 |
49 |
15 |
|
John Roberts |
||||
|
2005 Aug 28-30 |
8 |
24 |
48 |
20 |
|
Ruth Bader Ginsburg |
||||
|
1993 Jun 18-21 |
14 |
4 |
47 |
35 |
|
Clarence Thomas |
||||
|
1991 Jul 11-14 |
7 |
20 |
46 |
27 |
|
^ Asked of a half sample |
||||
(Asked of a half sample) Based on what you have heard or read about her, do you think Sonia Sotomayor's views on important issues are in the mainstream or do you think they are too extreme?
|
Mainstream |
Too extreme |
No opinion |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
|
|
Sonia Sotomayor |
|||
|
2009 May 29-31 ^ |
49 |
30 |
21 |
|
Samuel Alito |
|||
|
2006 Jan 6-8 ^ |
52 |
30 |
19 |
|
2005 Nov 1 |
51 |
26 |
23 |
|
^ Asked of a half sample |
|||
Would you like to see President Obama nominate a new justice who would make the Supreme Court -- [ROTATED: more liberal than it currently is, more conservative than it currently is] -- or who would keep the Court as it is now?
|
More |
More |
Keep as |
No |
|
|
2009 May 7-10 |
28% |
41 |
26 |
5 |
Which of the following best describes your view about whether the next Supreme Court justice is [RANDOM ORDER] -- do you think it is -- [RANDOM ORDER: essential that the next justice is (a woman/Hispanic/black), is it a good idea, but not essential, does it not matter to you, (or do you think it is) a bad idea]?
A. A woman
|
Essential |
Good idea, not |
Doesn't |
Bad |
No |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
2009 May 7-10 |
6 |
26 |
64 |
3 |
1 |
|
2005 Oct 28-30 |
14 |
33 |
50 |
2 |
1 |
|
2005 Sep 26-28 ^ |
14 |
29 |
55 |
1 |
1 |
|
^ Asked of a half sample |
|||||
B. Hispanic
|
Essential |
Good idea, not |
Doesn't |
Bad |
No |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
2009 May 7-10 |
1 |
21 |
68 |
8 |
1 |
|
2005 Sep 26-28 |
3 |
23 |
69 |
4 |
1 |
C. Black
|
Essential |
Good idea, not |
Doesn't |
Bad |
No |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
2009 May 7-10 |
1 |
21 |
74 |
3 |
1 |
|
2005 Sep 26-28 |
5 |
21 |
71 |
2 |
1 |
|
Justified |
Not justified |
No opinion |
|
|
2006 Jan 20-22 |
38% |
48 |
15 |
Just your best guess, if Alito were confirmed to the Supreme Court, do you think he would -- or would not -- vote to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision on abortion?
|
Yes, would |
No, would |
No |
|
|
2006 Jan 20-22 |
34% |
44 |
21 |
|
2005 Nov 1 ^ |
38% |
38 |
24 |
|
^ Polls conducted entirely in one day, such as this one, are subject to additional error or bias not found in polls conducted over several days. |
|||
How closely do you plan to follow the Senate confirmation hearings for Samuel Alito, which are scheduled to begin on Monday -- very closely, somewhat closely, not too closely, or not at all?
|
Very |
Somewhat |
Not too |
Not |
No |
|
|
2006 Jan 6-8 |
18% |
45 |
23 |
14 |
1 |
Suppose that after his confirmation hearings you were convinced Samuel Alito would vote to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision on abortion. If that were the case, would you like to see the Senate vote in favor of Alito serving on the Supreme Court, or not?
|
Yes, vote in favor |
No, not |
No opinion |
|
|
2006 Jan 6-8 |
34% |
56 |
11 |
Next, as you may know, President Bush will soon announce another nominee to the Supreme Court to fill the seat of retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.
Which of the following best describes your view about whether the next Supreme Court justice is [RANDOM ORDER] -- do you think it is -- [RANDOM ORDER: essential that the next justice is (a woman/someone who has experience judge/a conservative/someone who would vote to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision), is it a good idea, but not essential, does it not matter to you, (or do you think it is) a bad idea]?
A. A woman
|
Essential |
Good |
Doesn't |
Bad |
No |
|
|
2005 Oct 28-30 |
14% |
33 |
50 |
2 |
1 |
|
2005 Sep 26-28 ^ |
14% |
29 |
55 |
1 |
1 |
|
^ Asked of a half sample |
|||||
B. Someone who has experience as a judge
|
Essential |
Good |
Doesn't |
Bad |
No |
|
|
2005 Oct 28-30 |
50% |
36 |
11 |
2 |
1 |
C. A conservative
|
Essential |
Good |
Doesn't |
Bad |
No |
|
|
2005 Oct 28-30 |
21% |
24 |
32 |
20 |
3 |
D. Someone who would vote to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision on abortion
|
Essential |
Good |
Doesn't |
Bad |
No |
|
|
2005 Oct 28-30 |
16% |
16 |
20 |
42 |
6 |
Regardless of how you think the Senate should vote, would you say you are pleased or disappointed with George W. Bush's choice of Harriet Miers as the nominee to the Supreme Court?
|
Pleased |
Disappointed |
No opinion |
|
|
2005 Oct 21-23 |
40% |
50 |
10 |
Based on what you have heard or read about Harriet Miers, do you think she is among the most qualified people who could serve on the Supreme Court, is she qualified to serve on the Supreme Court, but many others are more qualified, or is she not qualified to serve on the Supreme Court?
|
Among most |
Qualified |
Not |
No |
|
|
2005 Oct 21-23 |
20% |
49 |
22 |
9 |
Do each of the following make you feel more positive or more negative toward Harriet Miers? [RANDOM ORDER]
|
2005 Oct 21-23 |
More positive |
More negative |
No opinion |
|
% |
% |
% |
|
|
She was one of the first women to hold important positions in the legal community in Texas |
76 |
16 |
8 |
|
She attends an evangelical Christian church |
55 |
29 |
16 |
|
She has worked closely with George W. Bush for many years |
44 |
52 |
4 |
|
She expressed opposition to abortion while running for office in 1989 |
41 |
52 |
7 |
|
She has never served as a judge |
27 |
66 |
7 |
|
Her views on major issues are not known |
23 |
70 |
7 |
Would you like to see President Bush -- [ROTATED: continue to support his nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court (or) withdraw his nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court]?
[ASKED OF A HALF SAMPLE]
|
Continue to |
Withdraw |
No |
|
|
2005 Oct 13-16 |
46% |
36 |
18 |
Now, turning to the Supreme Court. As you may know, after John Roberts is confirmed as Chief Justice, President Bush will soon announce ANOTHER nominee to the Supreme Court to fill the seat of retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.
Would you like to see President Bush nominate a new justice who would make the Supreme Court -- [ROTATED: more liberal than it currently is, more conservative than it currently is] -- or who would keep the Court as it is now?
|
More |
More |
Keep as |
No |
|
|
2005 Sep 26-28 |
30% |
33 |
29 |
8 |
|
2005 Jun 16-19 |
30% |
41 |
24 |
5 |
How closely do you plan to follow the Senate confirmation hearings for John Roberts, which are scheduled to begin in September -- very closely, somewhat closely, not too closely, or not at all closely?
|
Very |
Somewhat |
Not too |
Not |
No |
|
|
2005 Aug 28-30 |
18% |
41 |
22 |
18 |
1 |
As you may know, senators will be asking John Roberts about his views on a variety of subjects. On what subjects would you most like to hear John Roberts' views during his confirmation hearings? [OPEN-ENDED]
|
2005 Aug 28-30 |
|
|
% |
|
|
Abortion/Roe v. Wade/Women's right to choose |
28 |
|
Minority rights/Civil rights |
6 |
|
Economics |
6 |
|
Gas/Oil prices |
5 |
|
Judicial system reform/Supreme Court issues |
5 |
|
Constitutional view |
4 |
|
Gay marriage/Homosexual rights |
4 |
|
Healthcare |
4 |
|
Religious issues |
3 |
|
War |
3 |
|
Death penalty/Capital punishment |
3 |
|
Morals/Family values |
3 |
|
Crime |
2 |
|
Education reform |
2 |
|
Stem cell research |
2 |
|
Terrorism |
2 |
|
Foreign affairs |
2 |
|
Affirmative action |
2 |
|
His background (qualifications/integrity) |
1 |
|
Immigration |
1 |
|
Gun control |
1 |
|
Privacy laws |
1 |
|
Eminent domain |
1 |
|
Other |
14 |
|
Nothing |
11 |
|
Everything |
1 |
|
No opinion |
19 |
|
Percentages add to more than 100% due to multiple responses |
Do you think John Roberts should -- [ROTATED: answer questions from the Senators about his views on specific issues such as abortion or affirmative action, (or should he) only answer questions from the Senators about his general judicial philosophy]?
[ASKED OF A HALF SAMPLE]
|
Specific |
Only judicial |
No |
|
|
2005 Aug 28-30 |
55% |
42 |
3 |
Suppose the upcoming confirmation hearings indicate that John Roberts is qualified and has no ethical problems. Do you think U.S. Senators would be justified -- or unjustified -- in voting against him if they disagree with his stance on current issues such as abortion or affirmative action?
[ASKED OF A HALF SAMPLE]
|
Justified |
Unjustified |
No opinion |
|
|
2005 Aug 28-30 |
40% |
54 |
6 |
Which do you think is more likely to occur during the Senate confirmation hearings for Roberts -- [ROTATED: a relatively easy process in which Republicans and Democrats come to an agreement, (or) a major fight between Republicans and Democrats that would drag on for a long time]?
|
Relatively |
Major |
No |
|
|
2005 Jul 22-24 |
42% |
51 |
7 |
When the U.S. Senate holds hearings on the John Roberts nomination, do you think Senators should insist that he explain his views on abortion before confirming him, or should he be allowed to refuse to answer questions about abortion?
|
Insist he explain |
Allowed to |
No |
|
|
2005 Jul 22-24 |
61% |
37 |
2 |
If a nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court favors keeping the Roe v. Wade decision on abortion, in your view, should that alone disqualify that person from serving on the Supreme Court, or not?
ASKED OF A HALF SAMPLE
|
Yes, should |
No, should not |
No opinion |
|
|
2005 Jul 22-24 |
13% |
85 |
2 |
If a nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court favors overturning the Roe v. Wade decision on abortion, in your view, should that alone disqualify that person from serving on the Supreme Court, or not?
ASKED OF A HALF SAMPLE
|
Yes, should |
No, should not |
No opinion |
|
|
2005 Jul 22-24 |
25% |
72 |
3 |
As you may know, conservative and liberal groups have begun campaigns to influence the choice of who is picked to serve on the Supreme Court. These campaigns include advertisements and lobbying of Senators. Do you feel these campaigns will be helpful or harmful to getting the best person on the court?
|
Helpful |
Harmful |
No opinion |
|
|
2005 Jul 7-10 |
39% |
54 |
7 |
As you may know, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide a case regarding whether a monument to the Ten Commandments can be displayed on the grounds of state government buildings in Texas and Kentucky. Do you think the U.S. Supreme Court should -- or should not -- allow the state governments to display that monument?
|
Yes, should |
No, should not |
No opinion |
|
|
2005 Jun 24-26 |
75% |
23 |
2 |
|
2005 Feb 25-27 ^ |
76% |
21 |
3 |
|
^ Asked of a half sample |
|||
|
WORDING: As you may know, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide a case regarding whether a monument to the Ten Commandments can be displayed on the grounds of the Texas state capitol building. Do you think the U.S. Supreme Court should -- or should not -- allow the state government to display that monument? |
|||
Suppose President Bush decides to nominate the person who he thinks is the best choice for the U.S. Supreme Court, but almost all the Democrats in the Senate oppose the nominee because they disagree with that person on important issues. Should President Bush -- [ROTATED: still nominate the person he thinks is best for the job, (or should he) nominate another well qualified person whom the Democrats find acceptable]?
|
Still nominate |
Nominate |
No |
|
|
2005 Jun 16-19 |
46% |
51 |
3 |
Suppose almost all the Democrats in the Senate oppose President Bush's nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court because they disagree with that person on important issues. Should the Democrats in the Senate -- [ROTATED: still vote to confirm the president's nominee unless they believe that the person is not qualified legally or ethically, (or should they) work to defeat the nomination to try to get the president to pick someone that is more acceptable to them]?
|
Vote to confirm |
Work to defeat |
No |
|
|
2005 Jun 16-19 |
40% |
53 |
7 |
Click below for more on these topics:
The Gallup World Poll gives you the power to know - and act on - what the world is thinking.