GALLUP NEWS SERVICE
PRINCETON, NJ -- The House of Representatives is scheduled to
vote this week to determine whether the federal government will
take control of airport security in the future. Aside from this
debate, a number of specific options for securing the safety of
commercial air travel have been floated since the Sept. 11
terrorist hijacking of four passenger planes, and, to varying
degrees, the public supports all of them. From armed marshals to
longer check-in times, and everything in between, Americans favor a
wide range of proposals designed to thwart terrorists from boarding
airplanes and gaining command of cockpits.
- The most widely supported air safety measure tested in public
opinion surveys over the past two months is "making cockpit doors
on all passenger airliners stronger and more secure," a proposal
initially resisted by some pilots but favored by 96% of
Americans.
- A variety of polls find support for placing armed sky marshals
on all commercial airliners at around 90%.
- Putting pilot control of aircraft ahead of passenger comfort
and safety is a remedy favored by 85% of Americans.
- Roughly three-quarters or more of the public favors specific
proposals that would negatively impact passenger convenience, such
as requiring passengers to check in two to three hours before a
flight (75% favor this) and limiting carry-on luggage to one bag
(80% are in favor).
- When asked simply whether they would favor turning over the job
of airport security to the federal government, 77% of Americans say
yes, although support for this drops to 63% if the Army or National
Guard would be in charge.
- About two-thirds of Americans are in favor of arming airline
pilots (68%) or other airline personnel (65%). This is clearly more
controversial than the sky marshal program that receives close to
unanimous public support.
- A Gallup poll in mid-September found a bare majority (51%) in
favor of prohibiting all passenger carry-on bags, including purses,
briefcases and computers.
Lax Airport Security Blamed More Than FBI or CIA
Failings
According to Gallup's most recent survey, conducted Oct. 19-21,
most Americans welcome more visible signs of increased security at
airports, with 68% saying the presence of National Guard troops,
for instance, makes them feel more secure.
The public's sense of airport security was clearly shaken after
Sept. 11, when Americans identified lax airport security, more than
any other factor, as most to blame for what happened. A
mid-September Gallup poll found 49% of Americans assigning a "great
deal" of blame for the attacks to airport security, compared to
just 22% who blamed the CIA and 18% the FBI. A Newsweek poll around
the same time confirmed this result, with 57% of Americans blaming
"inadequate security at airports" for allowing the attacks to
happen, compared to just 30% blaming the FBI and CIA for failing to
identify and stop the terrorist plots from being carried out.
Perhaps in part because of the perception that terrorism is most
effectively stopped at the airport gate, measures to strengthen
airport security tend to be far less controversial than are other
proposals for combating terrorism. A late September survey by
Newsweek found that while 72% would "strongly favor" tight new
restrictions on air travel, strong support is much lower for the
establishment of a national identification card for all United
States residents (51%), for random identification checks on the
nation's streets and highways (26%) and for making it easier for
federal authorities to monitor private e-mail and telephone
communications (20%).
Survey Methods
The Gallup results reported here are based on telephone
interviews with a randomly selected national sample of 1,066
adults, 18 years and older, conducted Oct. 19-21, 2001. For results
based on this sample, one can say with 95 percent confidence that
the maximum error attributable to sampling and other random effects
is plus or minus 3 percentage points. In addition to sampling
error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting
surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public
opinion polls. Data reported in this article based on surveys
conducted by firms other than Gallup are available for review
through the University of Connecticut Roper Center.
Would you say the visible signs of increased security, such
as National Guard troops at airports and the Coast Guard boarding
ships at major U.S. ports, has made you feel -- [ROTATED: more
secure (or) less secure] -- about potential terrorism, or have they
had no effect on you either way?
| |
More secure
|
Less secure
|
No effect
|
No opinion
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2001 Oct 19-21
|
68%
|
2
|
30
|
*
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
* Less than 0.5%
|
|
|
|
|
Next, please tell me if you favor or oppose taking each of
the following actions in the United States for at least several
years. How about -- [RANDOM ORDER]?
A. Requiring Arabs, including those who have become U.S.
citizens, to carry a special ID
| |
Favor
|
Oppose
|
No opinion
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2001 Oct 19-21
|
49%
|
49
|
2
|
B. Instituting new security procedures that would require
passengers to check in two to three hours before their flight is
scheduled to depart
|
|
Favor
|
Oppose
|
No opinion
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2001 Oct 19-21
|
75%
|
23
|
2
|
C. Limiting airline passengers to carry on only one small
item such as a purse or briefcase
|
|
Favor
|
Oppose
|
No opinion
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2001 Oct 19-21
|
80%
|
18
|
2
|
D. Making it easier for legal authorities to read mail,
e-mail, or tap phones without the person's knowledge
|
|
Favor
|
Oppose
|
No opinion
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2001 Oct 19-21
|
37%
|
60
|
3
|