• Print

Civil Liberties

Americans' Views of Preservation of Civil Liberties vs. Prevention of Terrorism

As you may know, the Bush administration has been wiretapping telephone conversations between U.S. citizens living in the United States and suspected terrorists living in other countries without getting a court order allowing it to do so. Do you think the Bush administration was right or wrong in wiretapping these conversations without obtaining a court order?

Right

Wrong

No opinion

2006 Sep 15-17

55%

42

3

2006 Feb 9-12 ^

47%

50

3

2006 Jan 20-22 ^

46%

51

3

2006 Jan 6-8

50%

46

4

^

Asked of a half sample


As you may know, in the U.S. legal system the government is required to show defendants the evidence it has against them. In some terrorism trials, the government believes that showing defendants certain evidence may put American lives in danger. In your view, which would be worse -- [ROTATED: convicting defendants of terrorism based on evidence they are never shown, (or) having some terrorism suspects go free because the government chooses to withhold evidence rather than show it to the defendant]?

Convicting defendants on evidence they are never shown



Letting some terrorists go free



No
opinion

2006 Sep 15-17

48%

41

11


When interrogating prisoners, members of the U.S. military are required to abide by the Geneva Convention standards which prohibit the humiliating and degrading treatment of prisoners. When the CIA or Central Intelligence Agency questions suspects whom they believe to have information aboutpossible terror plots against the United States, do you think -- [ROTATED: they should have to abide by the same Geneva Convention standards that apply to the U.S. military (or) they should be able to use more forceful interrogation techniques than the Geneva Convention standards that apply to the U.S. military]?

Abide by Geneva Convention standards

Able to use more forceful techniques


Other/
Depends
(vol.)



No
opinion

2006 Sep 15-17

57%

38

2

3


Do you think the Bush administration -- [ROTATED: has gone too far, has been about right, or has not gone far enough] -- in restricting people's civil liberties in order to fight terrorism]?

Too
far

About
right

Not far enough

No
opinion

%

%

%

%

2006 May 12-13

41
34
19
6

2006 Jan 6-8

38

40

19

3

2003 Nov 10-12 ^

28

48

21

3

2003 Aug 25-26 ^

21

55

19

5

2002 Sep 2-4 ^

15

55

26

4

2002 Jun 21-23 ^

11

60

25

4

^ Asked of a half sample


As you may know, as part of its efforts to investigate terrorism, a federal government agency obtained records from three of the largest U.S. telephone companies in order to create a database of billions of telephone numbers dialed by Americans. How closely have you been following the news about this -- very closely, somewhat closely, not too closely, or not at all?


Very
closely

Somewhat
closely


Not too
closely


Not
at all


No
opinion

2006 May 12-13

28%

39

20

12

*


Based on what you have heard or read about this program to collect phone records, would you say you approve or disapprove of this government program?

Approve

Disapprove

No opinion

2006 May 12-13

43%

51

6


Is that mainly because -- [ROTATED: you do not think the program seriously violates Americans' civil liberties, (or is it mainly because) you think investigating terrorism is the more important goal, even if it violates some Americans' civil liberties]

[ASKEDF OF ADULTS WHO APPROVE OF GOVERNMENT PROGRAM]


Does not seriously violate civil liberties

Terrorism more important, even if violates civil liberties



No
opinion

2006 May 12-13

27%

69

4


Do you think there would ever be circumstances in which it would be right for the government to create a database of telephone records, or would it not be right for the government to do this under any circumstances?

[ASKED OF ADULTS WHO DISAPPROVE OF GOVERNMENT PROGRAM]

Yes, are

No, are not

No opinion

2006 May 12-13

34%

60

6


Based on what you have heard or read about this program, do you think it -- [ROTATED: definitely violates the law, probably violates the law, probably does not violate the law, (or) definitely does not violate the law]?


Definitely violates
the law


Probably violates
the law

Probably does not violate
the law

Definitely does not violate
the law



No
opinion

2006 May 12-13

22%

32

25

14

8


If you knew that the federal government had your telephone records, how concerned would you be -- very concerned, somewhat concerned, not too concerned, or not concerned at all?


Very concerned

Somewhat concerned


Not too concerned

Not concerned at all


No
opinion

2006 May 12-13

22%

13

20

44

1


If you knew that your telephone company had provided your telephone records to the federal government as part of this program, would you feel that your personal privacy had been violated, or not?

Yes, would
feel violated

No,
would not

No
opinion

2006 May 12-13

57%

42

1



Would you favor or oppose holding immediate congressional hearings to investigate this program?

Favor

Oppose

No opinion

2006 May 12-13

62%

34

4


How concerned are you that -- [ITEMS A-B ROTATED, ITEM C READ LAST]-- very concerned, somewhat concerned, not too concerned, or not concerned at all?

A. Based on this program, the government would misidentify innocent Americans as possible terrorist suspects


  1. Very concerned

    Somewhat concerned


    Not too concerned

    Not concerned at all


    No
    opinion

    2006 May 12-13

    36%

    29

    21

    14

    1


B. Based on this program, the government would listen in on telephone conversations within the U.S. without first obtaining a warrant


  1. Very concerned

    Somewhat concerned


    Not too concerned

    Not concerned at all


    No
    opinion

    2006 May 12-13

    41%

    22

    17

    19

    1



C. The government is gathering other information on the general public, such as their bank records or Internet usage


Very concerned

Somewhat concerned


Not too concerned

Not concerned at all


No
opinion

2006 May 12-13

45%

22

15

17

1


As you may know, shortly after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, a law called the Patriot Act was passed which makes it easier for the federal government to get information on suspected terrorists through court-ordered wiretaps and searches. How familiar are you with the Patriot Act -- very familiar, somewhat familiar, not too familiar, or not at all familiar?

Very
familiar

Somewhat familiar

Not too familiar

Not at all familiar

No
opinion

2006 Jan 6-8

17%

59

18

6

*

2004 Feb 16-17

13%

46

27

14

*

2003 Nov 10-12 ^

12%

41

25

22

*

2003 Aug 25-26 ^

10%

40

25

25

--

^

Asked of a half sample


Based on what you have heard or read about the Patriot Act, do you think -- [ROTATED: all of its provisions should be kept, that it needs minor changes, that it needs major changes, (or that) it needs to be eliminated completely]?

Keep all provisions

Minor changes

Major changes

Eliminated completely

No
opinion

2006 Jan 6-8

13%

50

24

7

7


As you may know, shortly after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, a law called the Patriot Act was passed. That law deals with the ways the federal government can obtain private information on people living in the U.S. who are suspected of having ties with terrorists. Based on what you have read or heard, do you think the Patriot Act -- [ROTATED: goes too far, is about right, or does not go far enough] -- in restricting people's civil liberties in order to investigate suspected terrorism?

Goes
too far

About
right

Not far enough

No
opinion

2005 Dec 16-18 ^

34%

44

18

4

2005 Jun 24-26

30%

41

21

8

^

Asked of a half sample


Which comes closer to your view -- [ROTATED: the government should take all steps necessary to prevent additional acts of terrorism in the U.S. even if it means your basic civil liberties would be violated, (or) the government should take steps to prevent additional acts of terrorism but not if those steps would violate your basic civil liberties]?

Take steps,
even if
civil liberties violated


Take steps but not violate civil liberties



No
opinion

%

%

%

2005 Dec 16-18 ^

31

65

4

2003 Nov 10-12 ^

31

64

5

2003 Aug 25-26 ^

29

67

4

2003 Apr 22-23

33

64

3

2002 Sep 2-4 ^

33

62

5

2002 Jun 21-23

40

56

4

2002 Jan 25-27

47

49

4

^

Asked of a half sample


As you may know, shortly after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, a law called the Patriot Act was passed. That law deals with the ways the federal government can obtain private information on people living in the U.S. who are suspected of having ties with terrorists. How familiar are you with the Patriot Act -- very familiar, somewhat familiar, not too familiar, or not at all familiar?

Very familiar

Somewhat familiar

Not too familiar

Not at all familiar

No
opinion

2005 Jun 24-26

12%

52

25

11

--


Next, I will read a list of things government officials can do when conducting a terrorism investigation. For each, please tell me if this is something government officials can do specifically because of the Patriot Act, or if it is something they could have done prior to the Patriot Act being passed. How about -- [RANDOM ORDER]?

[BASED ON 505 NATIONAL ADULTS IN FORM A]

A. Hold terrorism suspects indefinitely without charging them with a crime or allowing them access to a lawyer

Can do because
of the Patriot Act

Could do before Patriot Act passed


No
opinion

2004 Feb 16-17

60%

26

14



B. Require non-U.S. citizens who are suspected of terrorism offenses to face a trial before a military tribunal

Can do because
of the Patriot Act

Could do before
Patriot Act passed


No
opinion

2004 Feb 16-17

51%

34

15



C. Enter houses of worship or attend political rallies

Can do because
of the Patriot Act

Could do before
Patriot Act passed


No
opinion

2004 Feb 16-17

28%

54

18


One provision in the Patriot Act allows federal agents to secretly search a U.S. citizen's home without informing the person of that search for an unspecified period of time. Do you approve or disapprove of this provision?

[BASED ON 501 NATIONAL ADULTS IN FORM B]

Approve

Disapprove

No opinion

2004 Feb 16-17

26%

71

3


Another provision in the Patriot Act requires businesses, including hospitals, bookstores, and libraries, to turn over records in terrorism investigations and prevents the businesses from revealing to their patients or clients that these records have been turned over to the government. Do you approve or disapprove of this provision?

[BASED ON 501 NATIONAL ADULTS IN FORM B]

Approve

Disapprove

No opinion

2004 Feb 16-17

45%

51

4


One provision of the Patriot Act allows federal agents in terrorism or money-laundering investigations to submit lists of people to financial institutions. The institutions are required to reveal whether the people on the lists have accounts with them. The federal agents can submit the names without a judge's prior approval. Do you approve or disapprove of this provision?

[BASED ON 501 NATIONAL ADULTS IN FORM B]

Approve

Disapprove

No opinion

2004 Feb 16-17

51%

45

4

Click below to get more stories, RSS feeds, and e-mail alerts on these topics:

Copyright © 2009 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.
Gallup®, A8, Business Impact Analysis, CE11®, Clifton StrengthsFinder®, the 34 Clifton StrengthsFinder theme names, Customer Engagement Index, Drop Club®, Emotional Economy, Employee Engagement Index, Employee Outlook Index, Follow This Path, Gallup Brain®, Gallup Consulting®, Gallup Management Journal®, GMJ®, Gallup Press®, Gallup Publishing, Gallup Tuesday Briefing®, Gallup University®, HumanSigma®, I10, L3, PrincipalInsight, Q12®, SE25, SF34®, SRI®, Strengths Spotlight, Strengths-Based Selling, StrengthsCoach, StrengthsFinder®, StrengthsQuest, TeacherInsight, The Gallup Path®, and The Gallup Poll® are trademarks of Gallup, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. These materials are provided for noncommercial, personal use only. Reproduction prohibited without the express permission of Gallup, Inc.