skip to main content

State of the World’s Emotional Health 2025

Connecting Global Peace, Wellbeing and Health

This report, based on 145,000+ interviews across 144 countries and areas, investigates for the first time the links between emotions, peace and health.

Released in partnership with the World Health Summit, this analysis finds a strong connection between negative emotions and peace.

What Is the State of the World’s Emotional Health?

The world is on an emotional edge. Gallup World Poll data show that in 2024, 39% of adults worldwide reported worrying for much of the previous day, and more than a third said they felt stressed. Compared with a decade ago, hundreds of millions more people now experience these emotions.

Key Findings

Negative emotions remain high.

  • In 2024, 39% of adults worldwide reported experiencing a lot of worry the previous day.

  • Similarly, 37% of adults reported experiencing a lot of stress the previous day.

  • Fewer said they experienced daily physical pain (32%), sadness (26%) and anger (22%).

  • All measures are higher than they were a decade ago.


Positive emotions are steady.

  • Feeling treated with respect (88%) reached one of the highest levels Gallup has measured.

  • Daily experiences of laughter (73%), enjoyment (73%) and feeling well-rested (72%) held at long-term averages.

  • The 52% of adults saying they learned something interesting the previous day dipped slightly but remains higher than it was a decade ago.


Peace shapes emotions.

  • Sadness, worry and anger were more common in less peaceful countries as measured by the Institute for Economics & Peace’s Global Peace Index.

  • Anger, sadness and physical pain were higher in countries where scores on the Institute for Economics & Peace’s Positive Peace Index are weaker.

  • Positive emotions such as enjoyment and feeling respected were less common in countries with weaker scores on either index.

Do Emotions Matter to People’s Health and Peace in Their Countries?

Peace, health and emotional wellbeing are not separate outcomes. They deeply connect, reinforcing each other.

Peace allows health systems and daily life to function. By contrast, poor health and widespread unhappiness can fray societies and raise the risk of instability.

How is peace measured?

Researchers have long tried to measure peace itself. Two widely used global metrics produced by the Institute for Economics & Peace, the Global Peace Index and the Positive Peace Index, offer distinct but complementary perspectives.

What is the Global Peace Index?

The Global Peace Index tracks the absence of violence and conflict, reflecting the current state of and conditions for peace. Higher scores on the index mean greater levels of violence and conflict, while lower scores mean lower levels of violence and conflict.

What is the Positive Peace Index?

The Positive Peace Index looks deeper, at the institutions and structures that sustain peace over time, including fair governance and equitable resource distribution. Higher scores on the index mean sustainable peace is weaker, while lower scores mean it is stronger.

Understanding the Connection Between Peace and Emotional Wellbeing

The inaugural State of the World’s Emotional Health report pairs Gallup data on daily emotional “vital signs” with the Institute for Economics & Peace’s Global Peace Index and Positive Peace Index to show how peace and emotional wellbeing intersect — in contexts of conflict and in the conditions that sustain peace.

While these metrics provide essential lenses to world peace, Gallup research adds an aspect that these indexes cannot: how people feel.

Area around Global Peace Index that intersects with an area around Positive Peace Index creating an intersection area of Emotional Health

For nearly two decades, Gallup World Poll surveys in more than 140 countries and areas have tracked daily emotions such as worry, anger, sadness, stress and enjoyment.

These emotional wellbeing indicators tie to peace because they reveal risks that affect both stability and health. Daily emotions may serve as warning signals for leaders because how people feel each day has real consequences for health.

Prolonged stress, for example, contributes to chronic disease and shorter life expectancy. Conflict and fragility intensify these risks by undermining health at every level. For this reason, the World Health Organization identifies peace as a determinant of health — outcomes most at risk in fragile and conflict-affected states.

By examining emotions directly alongside peace, this report highlights how closely these dimensions are connected and gives leaders a new way to read risk and to build more stable, healthier societies.

The following sections show the trends in how negative and positive emotions have shifted over the past decade, offering leaders a clearer view of where distress is deepening, where wellbeing persists, and what this could mean for the world’s emotional health.

Global Trends: Daily Negative Emotions

placeholder

In 2024, Gallup asked adults worldwide whether they had experienced five negative emotions during much of the previous day:

  • Worry (39%) and stress (37%) topped the list, followed by physical pain (32%), sadness (26%) and anger (22%).

Except for physical pain, all experiences of negative emotions are down from their pandemic highs, but each is still much higher than a decade ago, showing how the world remains on an emotional edge.

  • Worry dropped by one point in 2024, returning to its pre-pandemic level. Yet it remains five points higher than it was in 2014 and almost 10 points higher than it was in 2006.

  • Physical pain rose two points, matching its previous high.

  • Stress, sadness and anger showed no change from the previous year.

Implications for Peace

The global rise in unhappiness over the past decade has been well-documented, yet many leaders have overlooked it because they rely on economic indicators while ignoring daily emotional health.

This oversight matters because negative emotions do not just reflect distress; they narrow people’s focus and erode their coping capacity. When these feelings become chronic, they leave individuals and societies more vulnerable to instability.

As the world’s mood has soured, it has also become less stable, with rising political unrest, more conflicts and higher death tolls.

Global Trends: Daily Positive Emotions

placeholder

In 2024, Gallup asked adults worldwide whether they had experienced five positive emotions during much of the previous day:

  • 88% of adults worldwide said they were treated with respect the previous day — up three points from 2023 and among the highest levels Gallup has ever recorded.

  • Smiling or laughing (73%) and enjoyment (73%) held steady at long-term averages.

  • 72% said they felt well-rested, essentially unchanged over the past decade, while 52% said they learned or did something interesting the previous day, which is slightly lower than in 2023 but still above 2014 levels.

The Resiliency of Positive Experiences

Globally, daily positive experiences have proven more resilient than negative ones — and in some cases, have even strengthened since the pandemic.

Research shows why:

  • Positive emotions broaden awareness and help people build lasting resources, such as coping strategies, relationships and resilience, which further feed into positive experiences.

  • These deeper foundations make positive experiences harder to shake, even in crisis, while negative emotions react more sharply to instability.

Demographic Differences in Emotional Wellbeing

Not everyone experiences these emotions equally — differences by gender and age reveal who carries the heaviest burdens and where wellbeing pressures are greatest.

Globally, women report more sadness, worry and physical pain. Younger adults carry more anger, while midlife adults bear the most stress. The oldest adults endure the most sadness.

Demographic differences in the daily experiences may reflect disparities in individuals’ health outcomes; these disparities reveal vulnerabilities that deepen during times of conflict in society or can be mitigated during times of peace.

Gender Gaps in Emotions Worldwide

placeholder

Women and men alike are experiencing more negative emotions than in the past. But for nearly two decades, more women than men have reported experiencing daily anger, sadness, worry and stress, as well as more physical pain. The gender gap only widened during the pandemic, particularly for sadness, worry and pain.

Women have also been more likely to report having health problems that keep them from activities people their age normally do. However, in 2024, this gender gap was the smallest in five years: 24% of women and 22% of men reported life-limiting health problems.

Yet women remain at least as likely — if not slightly more likely — as men to rate their lives positively enough to be considered “thriving” on Gallup’s Life Evaluation Index.

  • In 2024, 29% of women worldwide were thriving compared with 27% of men.

This resiliency underscores that higher daily distress does not necessarily translate into lower overall life evaluations.

Age Gaps in Emotions Worldwide

placeholder

Age matters, too. Younger adults (aged 15 to 49) are more likely than older adults to report feeling daily anger, which spiked during the pandemic and remains above 2014 levels.

However, the oldest adults are gaining ground. Stress peaks in midlife:

  • Adults aged 30 to 49 reported the most stress and feel the least well-rested.

  • Older adults (50+) were more likely to report sadness and worry, even as levels among younger groups eased slightly.

Positive experiences are broadly shared.

Women and men reported nearly identical levels of enjoyment and learning something interesting, while younger people stand out for higher enjoyment, laughter and learning.

Older adults reported fewer positives overall, though feeling treated with respect remains high and nearly uniform across all ages.

Country-Level Data on Emotional Wellbeing

Visit our Global Emotions 2025 interactive page to explore data on positive and negative experiences for all 144 countries and areas.

Just as emotions vary within populations, they also differ sharply across countries.

  • On the negative side, reported daily experiences of anger and sadness in Chad were among the highest in the world.

  • On the positive side, nearly nine in 10 people in Denmark said they were treated with respect the previous day, and large majorities reported laughter and enjoyment each day.


Fragile states show the most distress.

In 2024, several of the countries reporting the highest levels of negative emotions and experiences were fragile or conflict-affected states:

Anger by Country

  • Anger was highest in Chad, Jordan, Armenia, Northern Cyprus, Sierra Leone and Iraq — countries and areas marked by active conflict, recent wars, or ongoing political and economic instability.

  • In Chad, anger reached a record high in 2024, potentially reflecting public frustration after a deadly ammunition depot explosion in June and unrest surrounding disputed elections.

placeholder

View Anger Data for All Countries

Worry by Country

  • Worry was high in several countries with overlapping forms of fragility in 2024: Sierra Leone, Guinea, Chad and Mozambique.

  • From coup attempts and prolonged military rule to contested elections and violent insurgencies, each of those countries faced situations that eroded political stability, strained institutions and left citizens with heightened insecurity in daily life.

  • Worry also remained high in Malta (61%), which has struggled to balance its strong economic growth with social and environmental sustainability.

placeholder

View Worry Data for All Countries

Physical Pain by Country

  • Experiences of daily physical pain were the highest in the world in a similar group of countries, led by Sierra Leone and Chad, where more than two-thirds of the population reported being in physical pain a lot the previous day.

  • Such high levels in these two countries could reflect the combined effects of conflict, widespread malnutrition and fragile health systems that limit access to care.

placeholder

View Pain Data for All Countries

Sadness by Country

  • Sadness was high in Chad, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Guinea and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, all of which are post-conflict or continue to experience instability.

  • Notably, sadness in Chad reached a record high in 2024, underscoring the extent of emotional distress in one of the world’s most institutionally and socially fragile states.

placeholder

View Sadness Data for All Countries

Understanding Worry in Areas of Crisis

Recent events highlight the vulnerability of negative emotions to sudden shocks. These cases illustrate how conflict and crisis amplify emotional burdens — weakening the foundations of peace and health.

  • In Ukraine, worry rose from 31% in 2021 to 52% after Russia’s invasion in 2022 and has remained elevated since, including a new high of 57% in 2025.

  • In Lebanon, worry jumped from 40% in 2018 to 65% in 2019 during the country’s economic collapse and has rarely fallen below 50% since. Amid its fragile economic recovery, worry was 57% in 2025.

placeholder

Laughter, Enjoyment and Respect: Context Matters

Daily emotion reports reflect not only what people feel but also how their cultures shape expression.

  • In some cultures, people are encouraged to show joy, making them more likely to say they laughed or smiled the previous day.

  • In others, modesty or restraint are valued, so enjoyment may be underreported even when living standards are high.

The same applies to negative emotions: In some cultures, people downplay stress or worry to appear strong, while in others, they are more candid.

Countries such as Denmark, Paraguay and Indonesia often rank among the highest for positive daily experiences like laughter, enjoyment and feeling treated with respect.

Mexico, Panama and Guatemala also frequently appear near the top, showing that positive emotions are not limited to the world’s wealthiest or safest nations but also thrive where culture and social life play a strong role.

These patterns suggest that cross-country differences reflect not only material conditions but also cultural norms in how people experience and express their emotions.

placeholder

How Do Peace and Emotional Wellbeing Intersect?

Negative emotions are strongly linked to fragile peace.

To better understand how peace and emotional wellbeing intersect, Gallup compared daily emotions with two indexes produced by the Institute for Economics & Peace: the Global Peace Index and the Positive Peace Index.

  • The Global Peace Index measures negative peace — the absence of violence and conflict — across 163 countries, based on indicators such as levels of conflict, crime, political instability and militarization. Higher scores on the index mean greater levels of violence and conflict, while lower scores mean lower levels of violence and conflict.

  • The Positive Peace Index measures positive peace — the attitudes, institutions and structures that sustain lasting stability, including good governance, equitable resource distribution and social cohesion. Higher scores on the index mean sustainable peace is weaker, while lower scores mean it is stronger.

Together, the two indexes provide complementary perspectives: peace as it exists today, and the conditions that make it endure.

Gallup’s analysis shows that negative emotions are clear markers of fragile peace, though the patterns differ slightly between the Global Peace Index and the Positive Peace Index.

Correlations Between the Global Peace Index and Emotions

  • Negative emotions are associated with higher scores on the Global Peace Index, which means they are more common in countries that experience more violence and conflict.

  • Sadness, worry and anger, in particular, are common in less peaceful countries. These associations remain significant even after controlling for GDP, which means wealth does not explain all of the relationship.

  • Stress and physical pain also show connections at the raw correlation level, but these relationships disappear once GDP is taken into account.

placeholder

Correlations Between the Positive Peace Index and Emotions

  • Negative emotions are also associated with higher scores on the Positive Peace Index, which means they are more common in countries with weaker sustainable peace.

  • Anger, sadness and physical pain, in particular, are strongly associated with weaker Positive Peace scores.

  • After controlling for GDP, anger, sadness and physical pain are still strongly associated with weaker Positive Peace scores, while stress and worry are not.

placeholder

Positive Emotions and Peace: Weaker and GDP-Dependent

Positive emotions are less common in societies that experience more violence and do not have sustainable peace, but their associations with peace are not as strong as negative emotions.

  • With the Global Peace Index, experiencing enjoyment, feeling respected, well-rested, laughing and smiling and learning something interesting is less common in countries that score higher on the index (which means they are less peaceful). However, these relationships disappear after controlling for GDP.

  • With the Positive Peace Index, experiencing enjoyment and feeling respected is less likely in countries that are less peaceful, yet they too lose significance once GDP is accounted for.

This is not the case for negative emotions, which remain strongly tied to fragile peace — suggesting that while peace reduces distress, it does not deliver a positive emotional dividend above and beyond GDP per capita.

Why Negative Emotions Matter More to Peace

Psychologists have long observed a negativity bias: Bad events and feelings weigh more on people’s minds than good ones.

This helps explain why Gallup finds stronger links between fragile peace and distress than between strong peace and daily joy. Losing peace jolts human emotions far more than gaining peace lifts them, making negative emotions a more sensitive signal of fragility.

Independent research underscores this connection:

Together, these findings highlight why peace and health cannot be pursued separately.

Fragile peace shows up most clearly in negative emotions such as anger, sadness and pain, and these signals persist even after controlling for GDP.

Positive emotions, by contrast, track more with economic conditions than with peace itself.

For leaders, daily distress may offer a more reliable early-warning signal of fragility, with direct implications for health systems, stability and global development.

What Must Leaders Do to Improve the World's Emotional Health?

For policymakers, three needs stand out:

1

Track emotions as leading indicators. Widespread anger and sadness may signal fragile peace and growing health risks.

2

Integrate peace and health strategies. Strengthening governance, reducing conflict and investing in health systems must go hand in hand.

3

Recognize emotions as infrastructure. They are not abstract feelings but real-time indicators of social health, showing the human impact of peace and fragility through daily experiences.

Gallup's analysis shows that peace, health and emotional wellbeing rise and fall together. Leaders who ignore emotions risk missing the foundation of stability itself. Ignoring emotions means ignoring the foundation of peace.


Peace, health and wellbeing rise and fall together.

The new findings show that anger and sadness are strongly tied to weaker scores on both the Global Peace Index, which tracks the absence of violence and conflict, and the Positive Peace Index, which measures the institutions and structures that sustain long-term stability.

This means Gallup's emotion metrics likely reflect more than the immediate absence of conflict. They also mirror the deeper foundations of sustainable peace — the kind of peace that depends on justice, wellbeing and security in daily life.

These patterns matter for health, too. Gallup's tracking shows that negative daily emotions are negatively correlated with life expectancy at birth: Where peace is fragile, people experience more anger and sadness, and populations are likely to live shorter lives.


Peace and health goals are intertwined.

Gallup's findings reinforce why the UN's Sustainable Development Goal 3 (Good Health and Wellbeing) and Sustainable Development Goal 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions) cannot be separated.

When peace is absent, health systems and communities weaken, making daily life more difficult and less secure. When peace is present, health and emotional wellbeing have room to improve.

Gallup's research suggests that emotions may serve as vital signs of these larger systems — indicators leaders can use to understand risk and design policies that strengthen both peace and health.

Gallup’s World Poll continually surveys residents in more than 140 countries and areas, representing more than 98% of the world’s adult population, using randomly selected, nationally representative samples. Gallup typically surveys 1,000 individuals in each country or area, using a standard set of core questions that has been translated into the major languages of the respective country. In some regions, supplemental questions are asked in addition to core questions.

With some exceptions, all samples are probability based and nationally representative of the resident adult population. The coverage area is the entire country including rural areas, and the sampling frame represents the entire civilian, non-institutionalized, aged 15 and older population. Exceptions include areas where the safety of interviewing staff is threatened, scarcely populated areas in some countries, and areas that interviewers can reach only by foot, animal or small boat.

Gallup World Poll is a household survey; individuals in group quarters, homeless persons and nomadic residents are not included.

Gallup uses telephone surveys in Northern America, Western Europe, developed Asia and Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. In Central and Eastern Europe, much of Latin America, former Soviet states, nearly all of Asia, the Middle East and Africa, an area frame design is used for face-to-face interviewing. The results in this report are based on telephone and in-person interviews with nationally representative, probability-based samples among the adult population aged 15 and older, in 144 countries and areas in 2024.

For results based on the total sample of national adults in 2024, the margin of sampling error ranges between ±2.1 and ±5.4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. The margin of error reflects the influence of data weighting. In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.

Related Content

Global Indicator: Emotional Wellbeing

Interactive: Global Emotions Data

Global Emotions 2024 Report

Global Emotions 2023 Report

Global Emotions 2022 Report

Global Emotions 2021 Report

Global Emotions 2020 Report

Global Emotions 2019 Report

Global Emotions 2018 Report

Subscribe to Our Research

Sign up to receive email updates about our latest global analytics work, including insights from our survey research and polling around the world.

(*) Required